Political Storm Over Sabarimala Gold Theft Case as CPI(M) Claims Congress Retreated After Sonia Gandhi Link

 

 

A fresh political controversy has erupted in Kerala following new claims by the Communist Party of India (Marxist) regarding the ongoing Sabarimala gold theft case. The CPI(M) has alleged that the Congress party softened its stance and stepped back from aggressive criticism after the name of senior Congress leader Sonia Gandhi allegedly surfaced during discussions around the case. The charge has intensified political sparring between the state’s two major rivals, adding another layer to an already sensitive issue.

What Is the Sabarimala Gold Theft Case?

The Sabarimala gold theft case relates to the alleged misappropriation and irregular handling of gold and valuables donated by devotees at the Sabarimala temple, one of the most prominent pilgrimage centres in India. The issue has drawn public attention because of the massive scale of offerings at the shrine and the importance of transparency in managing temple assets.

Over time, questions have been raised by various political parties and activists over how the gold was stored, audited, and accounted for. While investigations and official clarifications are ongoing, the matter has increasingly become a political flashpoint in Kerala.

CPI(M)’s Allegation Against Congress

The CPI(M), which leads the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) in Kerala, has now accused the Congress of changing its tone on the issue. According to CPI(M) leaders, the Congress initially raised the matter aggressively but later retreated from its position once Sonia Gandhi’s name allegedly came up during political exchanges related to the controversy.

The Left party has framed this as an example of double standards, arguing that the Congress is quick to demand accountability until senior leaders are perceived to be politically linked to an issue.

Congress Response and Political Reactions

The Congress has rejected the CPI(M)’s claims, maintaining that it has not backed off from seeking clarity and accountability in the Sabarimala gold theft case. Party leaders have described the allegations as politically motivated, aimed at diverting attention from the core issue of transparency in temple administration.

Meanwhile, the BJP has also weighed in, criticising both the CPI(M) and the Congress, and accusing them of politicising a matter connected to religious sentiments and public trust.

Why the Issue Matters Politically

Sabarimala has long been a sensitive subject in Kerala politics, cutting across religious belief, governance, and electoral strategy. Any controversy linked to the temple tends to resonate deeply with devotees and the wider public.

The gold theft allegations add to this sensitivity, as they raise concerns over the management of offerings made in faith by millions of pilgrims. Political parties are under pressure to balance accountability with restraint, especially in a state where temple-related issues often influence public opinion.

The Road Ahead

At present, the Sabarimala gold theft case remains under scrutiny, with demands for transparency and proper audits continuing from multiple quarters. While political accusations and counter-accusations dominate headlines, the focus is expected to remain on official findings and procedural clarity.

As Kerala’s political temperature rises, the controversy underscores how quickly governance issues can turn into full-blown political storms—especially when high-profile names and revered institutions are involved.

Conclusion

The CPI(M)’s claim that the Congress retreated after Sonia Gandhi’s name surfaced has added fresh fuel to the Sabarimala gold theft debate. While parties trade allegations, public interest lies in clear facts, accountability, and transparent handling of temple assets. How the issue unfolds may have implications not just for Kerala politics, but also for broader debates on governance and faith-linked institutions in India.